Two articles with one topic but with different writing methods

With relations to a fire burning down part of the Notre Dame Cathedral two articles take similar approaches to discuss what exactly happened.  The first article from CBS said that the fire was may have been caused from a computer glitch however more than 40 people are being questioned. The article went on to say that more than a billion dollars has been donated in order to help rebuild the Cathedral. While on the other hand the other article by ABC takes a different approach to talking about the fire at the Cathedral. At first they talk about all the good things that the fire fighters have been able to with relations to the fire. This includes discussing how the fire fighters were able to save Jesus' thorn crown from being burned down. They also first included the fact that after four days of fire fighters working on the fire they have successfully been able to stop all of the burning points of the fire. However They say differently a computer glitch "may" have played a role in spreading the fire. Through this they further more show their different style of writing by ending their article with an incomplete thought. This is different from the first article because in the first article they directly said that the computer glitch had been caused by a compute glitch where as the second article says that the fire wasn't started by the glitch but spread because of it.